This experience is inspired by the surviving North Sámi goavddis associated with Poala-Ánde / Anders Poulsen and the testimony recorded at Vadsø in 1692. This reconstruction follows not only the final landing, but also the pointer’s simulated journey, its with-the-sun or against-the-sun direction, and the documented figures it touches. It also redraws the drum so all 25 documented figures are visible more clearly at once. Historical evidence and modern reflection remain deliberately separate.
Davvisámi · North Sámi25 documented figuresFive recorded rowsBrass pointer described in 1692Journey + direction reading
Before you begin
This is not presented as a universal Sámi oracle.
The surviving drum is unusual, and the explanation we have comes through a coercive seventeenth-century witchcraft case. The reconstruction therefore uses one specific historical source rather than mixing symbols from different Sámi regions.
Where a modern North Sámi label is secure, it is shown beside the historical 1692 form. Where it is not secure, the historical name is preserved instead of inventing a new one. In this version the full five-row layout is shown more openly so the whole documented figure field can be explored before or after a Drum Journey.
How the historical sources describe use
Movement mattered, not only the final symbol.
The rules below are separated by source. We do not combine different regional drum traditions into one “universal” method.
1692 · Poala-Ánde / Anders Poulsen
The North Sámi account used here
A small hollow brass object with a ring was placed on the drumskin.
The drum was lifted up and down and turned while it was struck with a reindeer-horn hammer.
The brass object moved or “danced” across the skin.
Poulsen said movement with the sun indicated good luck; movement against the sun indicated ill luck.
The source also connects movement toward particular figures with particular questions—for example, the wild-reindeer figure in a question about hunting luck.
What this reconstruction simulates
A visible Drum Journey
The brass pointer travels through several documented figures before stopping.
The page records a simulated with-the-sun or against-the-sun direction.
Earlier touched figures are shown as influences; the final landing receives the greatest weight.
The combination meaning is explicitly labelled modern reflection, because no complete 1692 combination table survives in the material used here.
Comparative source · c. 1725
A different South Sámi drum
A separate historical account from Bendik Andersen Frøyningsfjell’s South Sámi drum describes a brass indicator moving among symbols. If an undertaking was to be fortunate, the indicator was said to become motionless on the symbol representing that undertaking; otherwise it kept moving.
This supports the historical importance of movement and stopping, but it belongs to another drum and another regional tradition. This reconstruction does not present it as Poulsen’s rule.
The movement below is a modern simulation. The reconstruction records the journey across several figures, a simulated with-the-sun or against-the-sun direction, and a final landing. Only the individual historical figures and the directional rule are treated as historical evidence; the combined sequence reading is modern.
Sound is generated locally in your browser.
Diagrammatic reconstruction: row order is documented; exact positions, pictograms and the animated path are modern visualisations, not a facsimile of the museum object.
Direction = historical 1692 ruleTouched figures = documented symbols, modern sequence roleFinal landing = greatest weight in this reconstruction
The Drum Journey appears here after the brass pointer stops.
All 25 figures
Historical names and modern North Sámi where secure.
Click any figure to inspect it. A dash means we intentionally did not invent a modern North Sámi label.
What the 1692 testimony actually records
The court record says the skin was divided by four lines into five rows. It describes 25 figures and says Poulsen placed a small hollow brass object with a ring on the drum, lifted and turned the drum while striking it with a reindeer-horn hammer, and interpreted the pointer's movement.
The source says movement “right with the sun” was favourable and movement against the sun was unfavourable. It also records the ring moving toward particular figures in particular questions. Those claims are shown as historical evidence only; this site does not present them as supernatural facts.
RiddoDuottarMuseat describes the drum as a North Sámi goavddis and gives its measurements, provenance, construction history and return to Sámi ownership in 2022.
Modern Sámi labels are North Sámi only. Historical spellings from the court record are displayed separately because they are seventeenth-century transcriptions and should not be silently rewritten as modern North Sámi.